The two forms of self-consciousness try as much as possible to avoid death. This struggle persists until death, even though no self-consciousness would want death to take place since it would have fuelled a natural negation. Since an agreement will not be readily reached, the two will be engaged in constant process of convincing each other. Due to this, a contradiction emerges, but the self tries to resolve the conflict through negating the other self, using a dialectical method.
One self views the other self as an ordinary object with an autonomous shape. Based on this, Hegel concluded that the self does not appreciate the existence of another self. The two types of consciousness would as well perceive each other as animated objects as opposed to equal subjects. The self at this moment is viewed as a foreign object whose existence interferes with proper reasoning. The two levels of consciousness are never in harmony and they can even be in conflict to an extent that they fail to agree. Hegel was of the view that the objective suppression and objective sense of inferiority would gel to become one thing. This means that if an individual feels oppressed in his or her reasoning, there is a high likelihood that such an individual would indeed be oppressed even in normal life. Based on his view, whatever takes place in the mind of an individual would be the same thing that would take place in an individual’s life. Moreover, the same could be comprehended through an external process, particularly when it takes place between two people or two groups. Regarding master-slave dialectic, the views of Hegel were that the relationship between the owners of the means of production and the proletariat could be understood through an internal analysis or process, particularly when it occurs in one individual. This entails a group demanding for freedom after realizing that another group interferes with its interests. Knowledge development, according to Hegel, does not follow the basic rules of science, but instead it develops through a phenomenological construct, which has a clear history. Knowledge develops when one consciousness recognizes the existence of another consciousness meaning that conflicts among groups will never take place without each group developing a sense of belonging. Through self-awareness, a group of people develop certain knowledge, spirit, and sciences meaning that what people know are always held as true (Hegel 112). Hegel employed several concepts in analyzing how self-consciousness forms. He also discussed two critical issues related to life and desire. In his works on phenomenology, Hegel discussed the idea of independent and dependent self-consciousness whereby he talked about lordship and bondage in detail. The article situates the reasoning of Hegel in two articles, one being the Second Sex by Simone and the other is the modern woman as a subject by Fanon. This article analyzes how Hegel used the idea of the master and the slave to bring out the conflicts that usually exist among various groups in society. The development of the mind starts with the lower levels and ends with the high levels. People’s minds go through a number of stages as regards to consciousness. In the phenomenology of spirit, Hegel presented the science of experience of consciousness whereby he described the process through which people’s consciousness develops over time.
The two would always be in conflict for quite some time before forging a common position, something he termed as a synthesis. In his analysis, a thesis would generate a reaction that he referred to as the antithesis. He suggested that a conflict would be resolved in three stages. Hegel formulated a method that would be used in resolving conflicts among members of society.
0 kommentar(er)
